Therefore, I posted above what might be considered a "hoped for" question/answer. I am familiar with configration software used for Industrial products. Since I am already familar with SCARM's user interface, and based on your helpful inputs, I will continue in the direction of fee based SCRAM. My direct experience is limited and only with the free version of SCARM but i am now ready to move to another platform even if there is a fee.
Thanks again for your replys and input - especially the history by DoubleDAZ. Occasionally someone will post RRT and AnyRail files, but SCARM remains the most popular.
A few others use AnyRail, but mostly the limited free version. Ken used to post designs in the forum, mostly for small spaces, but I don’t remember many files being shared and now he has a regular column in the ORG magazine. Those of us who have used SCARM over the years freely share our SCARM files so others can make changes to suit their needs. I still have RRT, but also have the free version of AnyRail for those occasions when someone needs help trying to figure out how to do something with it. By that time I was using SCARM full time, even did some testing of new/expanded features for him.
He kept a free version for 100 pieces and started charging for the full version. Then Milen decided to release v1.0 and get paid for his efforts. SCARM was free at the time and that lasted about 3 years or so. The big draw for me was the 3D simulation feature, far better than the one in RRT. I started with RR-Track in 2012, upgraded to v5 when it was released, but gradually learned SCARM shortly after that when I saw Moonman was helping folks fix their designs and I joined in.
0 kommentar(er)
